Moral Turpitude Immigration: Impact on U.S. Visa Applicants

Office Locations

Proudly Serving Dallas, FT.Worth, San Antonio, Houston.


OFFICE 1700 Pacific Ave. #3750, Dallas, TX 75201


OFFICE 851 Grainger St. Ste 107 Fort Worth TX 76104


OFFICE 110 Broadway St. Ste 370, San Antonio, TX 78205


OFFICE 815 Walker Street, Ste 945, Houston, TX

Navigating Moral Turpitude and Immigration

Imagine facing serious consequences because of a past mistake. Understanding the impact of a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) is essential for immigrants. Although it sounds technical, this term can greatly affect your immigration status.

A CIMT can make someone inadmissible, deportable, or ineligible for relief. Many people wonder which crimes are considered CIMTs and how they are determined. Extensive case law and decisions have provided guidance in identifying these crimes.

Exploring moral turpitude is crucial for understanding its role in immigration law. This topic has significant implications for those seeking visas or Green Cards. How can one navigate this complex legal landscape? We aim to clarify this with relevant insights and examples.

If you need help, Andrew T. Thomas, Attorneys at Law, can assist. We help in issues related to crimes of moral turpitude, immigration consequences, and moral turpitude convictions.

Importance of Moral Turpitude in Immigration

The concept of moral turpitude plays a crucial role in immigration processes, affecting immigrants’ eligibility for visas, Green Cards, and citizenship. Let’s examine its significance, legal interpretations, and crime types.

Moral turpitude refers to conduct that is considered morally reprehensible and indicative of a person’s character. This concept has significant implications for U.S. immigration law.

Proof of moral turpitude (CIMT) crime can lead to severe consequences, such as deportation or denial of entry. Immigrants may face challenges in demonstrating that their past actions do not reflect a moral turpitude conviction, which can impact their ability to remain or settle in the United States.

Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude

Crimes involving moral turpitude encompass a broad range of offenses deemed to be against moral standards. These crimes are characterized by elements of fraud, larceny, intent to harm persons or property, and similar misconduct. The term refers generally to actions that society finds morally unacceptable.

Examples include:

  • Theft

  • Fraud

  • Assault with intent to rob or kill

Each of these crimes has implications under federal law and the Immigration and Nationality Act, which guides the assessment and outcomes for immigrants involved in such offenses. A criminal conviction for a crime of moral turpitude can significantly impact immigration proceedings, often leading to severe consequences such as deportation or denial of entry.

Legal Interpretation and Precedents

The legal interpretation of moral turpitude has evolved through case law and decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). These rulings define the scope and application of moral turpitude in immigration matters.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, courts and immigration authorities assess whether an offense qualifies as a CIMT. Legal precedents offer guidance, but ambiguity makes each case’s context crucial.

Precedent-setting cases and statutes play a vital role in how moral turpitude is applied in immigration decisions, affecting the lives and futures of countless individuals.

Learn more about the legal details and implications of crimes of moral turpitude.

Impact on Immigration Status

Crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT) significantly impact a noncitizen’s ability to enter, remain, and achieve lawful status in the U.S. Depending on the nature and severity of the crime, noncitizens may face inadmissibility or deportation.

Inadmissibility and Deportability

In immigration law, inadmissibility refers to conditions that prevent someone from being allowed to enter the United States. Deportability, on the other hand, signifies grounds upon which a noncitizen already in the U.S. can be removed. Crimes of moral turpitude can trigger both of these outcomes.

Under INA 212(a)(2), a conviction for a CIMT can make an individual inadmissible. This includes being barred from obtaining a visa or green card. Even a single conviction for a CIMT can affect naturalization, jeopardizing the path to U.S. citizenship by reflecting adversely on good moral character (GMC). Certain exceptions and waivers might be available but are limited and require thorough legal scrutiny.

CIMTs can also make someone deportable. Noncitizens convicted of CIMTs may face removal proceedings, especially if these offenses occurred within five years of admission to the U.S. and resulted in a prison sentence of at least one year.

A secondary CIMT, at any time after admission, further increases deportability risks. Aggravated felonies, including crimes of violence, further intensify these consequences due to their severe nature.

Case Examples

Examining real-life cases helps illustrate the impact of CIMTs on immigration status. One example involved a noncitizen convicted of theft who was considered a CIMT. Despite arguments highlighting the minor nature of the offense, the individual faced deportation due to the adverse judgment on GMC and the criminal record.

Another case demonstrated the complexities when a noncitizen faced deportation for a DUI conviction. While typically not classified as a CIMT, the presence of aggravating factors complicates the immigration status. For more information on the intersection of DUI and immigration, see How will a DWI affect my immigration status?

We also look at scenarios where legal waivers played a critical role. For example, a noncitizen who committed a petty offense might secure a waiver that allows for adjustment of status. These cases highlight the nuanced and multifaceted nature of CIMT-related immigration outcomes.

Understanding the potential impact of CIMTs on immigration status underscores the importance of careful legal navigation to mitigate severe consequences like deportation and inadmissibility.

Legal Defenses and Waivers

Navigating the complexities of moral turpitude charges in immigration cases requires strategic defenses and a clear understanding of available waivers. Each case is unique and demands a tailored approach to mitigate or overcome charges.

Possible Defenses Against Moral Turpitude Charges

Several legal defenses can challenge charges of moral turpitude. First, a lack of guilty knowledge can be a significant defense. If evidence shows that the defendant did not understand their actions were wrong or criminal, the charges might not hold.

Insufficient evidence is another key defense. The prosecution must establish that the crime indeed involved moral turpitude. Ambiguities or lacking proof can dismantle the case.

Prosecutors may also accept lesser charges in plea deals. By negotiating for misdemeanors or crimes that do not constitute moral turpitude, we can protect an immigrant’s status.

Finally, presenting credible character witnesses and demonstrating a history of good behavior might persuade courts to dismiss or reduce severity.

Waivers for Inadmissibility

Obtaining waivers can be crucial for overcoming inadmissibility due to moral turpitude. The USCIS provides several pathways for legal forgiveness. The Section 212(h) waiver is commonly used; it requires showing that the denial of admission would cause extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, parent, or child.

The petty offense exception might apply if the crime’s maximum penalty does not exceed one year of imprisonment and the actual sentence meted out was six months or less.

Also, presenting a certified disposition of prior criminal convictions can clarify the nature and context of the offense, assisting in waiver requests.

For those who have already faced removal, reentry after deportation might involve navigating complex legal challenges, but assistance is available. Legal professionals can craft compelling waiver applications that underscore significant mitigating factors.

How Andrew T. Thomas, Attorneys at Law Can Help

Immigration issues involving moral turpitude can be complex and intimidating. Our firm, Andrew T. Thomas, Attorneys at Law, offers legal defense tailored to each client’s unique situation.

Our team of experienced attorneys navigates the intricacies of federal immigration statutes. We provide confidential and straightforward advice aimed at protecting your rights.

Services Offered:

  • Legal Defense: Crafting strong defenses for individuals facing immigration court due to crimes of moral turpitude.

  • Waiver Applications: Helping clients apply for waivers to overcome inadmissibility issues and maintain their immigration status.

  • Personal Consultation: One-on-one meetings to discuss your case and devise a strategy.

Our adherence to the highest standards of legal practice ensures effective representation. We are proud members of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, reflecting our dedication to excellence in legal services.

Trust our team to advocate for your immigration status and rights throughout the entire legal process.

Protect Your Future with Andrew T. Thomas, Attorneys at Law

The consequences for crimes such as fraud, theft, and aggravated assault can be severe, potentially leading to deportation or inadmissibility to the United States.

Moral turpitude entails acts of evil intent or committing an offense recklessly. Crimes like rape, murder, and robbery fall under this category and can have serious immigration implications.

Andrew T. Thomas, Attorneys at Law, based in Houston, TX, can advise those facing such charges. Our wide network of offices across major cities enables us to deliver comprehensive legal representation. Protect your status and future by consulting with us today.